Skip to main content

Watkins v. State

Citations

  • 229 S.E.2d 465
  • 237 Ga. 678
  • 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1352

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding a violation of a defendant’s right to be present was harmless error
  • concluding prejudice existed when “two jurors made an unauthorized visit to the scene of the crime and gauged the time it took to drive from there to appellant’s house”
  • creating exception to rule because two jurors went to scene of crime, measured distances, and reported findings to full jury
  • reversing convictions because two jurors made unauthorized visits to crime scene, conducted fact-finding, and reported findings to the rest of the jury
  • explaining that the general rule that jurors are not permitted to impeach their own verdict is deeply rooted in Georgia law as it promotes important public policy considerations, but that such rule does yield to a defendant’s constitutional right to a fair trial
  • reversing convictions because two jurors made unauthorized visits to crime scene, conducted fact-finding, and reported findings to the rest of the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ingram

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

94 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.