Watkins v. Snyder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Plaintiffs’ Petitions do not state any legal theory entitling them to wages collectible under the IWPCL other than a violation of the FLSA.”
• “Decisions that reason that a complaint asserting an FLSA collective action must first meet the ordinary standards of Rule 8 are more persuasive.”
• “[A]n FLSA minimum wage complaint should, at least approximately, allege the hours worked for which [minimum] wages were not received.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[Although complicated, it is possible to try FLSA and IWPCL claims simultaneously.”
• contrasting the IWPCL and IMWL in this respect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).