Skip to main content
· 1/15/1861

Watkins v. Quarles

Citations

  • 23 Ark. 179

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that, but for the government’s alleged improper elimination of the plaintiffs proposal for being untimely, the plaintiff had a substantial chance of being awarded the contract
  • proposal e-mailed fifty-nine minutes before the deadline

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Compton, Fairchild

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.