Watkins v. Carty's Automotive Electrical Center, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the finality considerations that underlie Rule 60(b) serve interests beyond the possible prejudice to the party opposing the [motion to reinstate]” (citation omitted)
• dismissal with prejudice under Rule 41(b) is a drastic measure and should be sparingly exercised

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).