Skip to main content
· 12/15/1854

Watkins v. Bevans

Citations

  • 6 Md. 489

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that such an advance constitutes champerty and maintenance because it gives a nonparty an impermissible interest in a suit, impedes the settlement of the underlying case, and promotes speculation in lawsuits
  • noting that, although the doctrines of champerty and maintenance have “lain dormant in Ohio courts” in recent years, they remain part of Ohio’s common law as contract defenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eccleston, Grand, Mason, Tuck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.