Watkins Inc. v. Chilkoot Distributing, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, under Minnesota law, “[o]rdinarily, the existence of a contract is a question of fact to be determined by the jury”
• under Minnesota law, “the parol evidence rule does not apply to the question of whether a contract was formed” (citing Ridgway v. Hennepin County, 182 N.W.2d 674, 679 (Minn. 1971)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).