Watkins Development, LLC v. Hosemann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that without the override the agency would lose three million dollars a month and public property would be subject to vandalism and other threats to public safety
• reviewing a “best interests” determination under the § 706(2)(A) standard without discussion of whether that decision is committed to agency discretion, citing Spherix, Inc. v. United States
• Court credited HUD concerns that unmanaged properties would pose financial and public safety risks.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).