Watervale Marine Co., Ltd. v. United States Department of Homeland Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a court has subject-matter jurisdiction over a' claim that an agency “misinterpreted and misapplied” a statutory provision “in violation of the APA” (citation omitted)
• \[T]he Coast Guard’s argument here is that the challenged security agreements are ‘essential’ to its investigation and prosecution of suspected MARPOL violations [.]\
• \[I]t is established in this circuit that 'executive branch decision[s] involving foreign policy matters or sensitive matters of national security are nonjusticiable by nature.' \ (second alteration in original) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
• “[I]t is established in this circuit that ‘executive branch decision[s] involving foreign policy matters or sensitive matters of 47 national security are nonjusticiable by nature.” (second alteration in original) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).