Skip to main content
· 1/7/2019

Waterson v. United States

Citations

  • 139 S. Ct. 835
  • 202 L. Ed. 2d 607

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Paul to disqualify expert based on court’s inherent power to disqualify when a conflict of interest existed, despite the fact that the expert did not have the ability to disclose confidential information to adverse party.
  • court has “inherent power to disqualify an expert witness when a conflict of interest exists”
  • court has “inherent power to disqualify an expert witness when a conflict of interest exists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.