Skip to main content
· 3/16/2011

Waters v. KREAM

Citations

  • 770 F. Supp. 2d 434
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26952
  • 2011 WL 899361

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Under the generally approved standard, a ‘least sophisticated consumer’ is not obliged to closely parse the words of a communication in order to divine its meaning. . . . The substance of the communication, read as a whole, matters more than its linguistic construction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Toole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.