· 9/30/1999
Waters v. International Precious Metals Corp.
Citations
- 190 F.3d 1291
- 45 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 300
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 24281
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the values attached to “many” class action settlement funds are “illusory” or “meaningless”
- noting that the “majority of common fund fee awards fall between 20% to 30% of the fund”
- upholding an attorney fee award based on the entire settlement fund, even though a portion reverted to the defendant
- upholding an attorney fee award based on the entire settlement fund, even though a portion reverted to the defendant
- upholding an attorney fee award based on the entire settlement fund, even though a portion reverted to the defendant
- approving fee award where the district court determined that the benchmark should be 30% and then adjusting the fee award higher based on the circumstances of the case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tjoflat, Birch, Bright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.