Skip to main content
· 9/30/1999

Waters v. International Precious Metals Corp.

Citations

  • 190 F.3d 1291
  • 45 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 300
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 24281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the values attached to “many” class action settlement funds are “illusory” or “meaningless”
  • noting that the “majority of common fund fee awards fall between 20% to 30% of the fund”
  • upholding an attorney fee award based on the entire settlement fund, even though a portion reverted to the defendant
  • upholding an attorney fee award based on the entire settlement fund, even though a portion reverted to the defendant
  • upholding an attorney fee award based on the entire settlement fund, even though a portion reverted to the defendant
  • approving fee award where the district court determined that the benchmark should be 30% and then adjusting the fee award higher based on the circumstances of the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Birch, Bright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.