Skip to main content
· 5/25/1888

Waters v. Burgess

Citations

  • 2 Monag. 570
  • 14 A. 398
  • 1888 Pa. LEXIS 784

Syllabus

<p>The evidence in this case was held to be more than a scintilla, and the case having been submitted without error on the part of the court, and the jury having arrived at its verdict through the exercise of its right to pass upon the credibility of witnesses, the supreme court will not reverse the judgment entered upon the verdict, although they may think that the weight of the evidence was with the party against whom the verdict was rendered.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiffs had no “absolute legal right to exclude from a newspaper any photograph of them taken without their permission” because “[i]f every person had such a right, no newspaper could lawfully publish a photograph of’ a public scene

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.