Waterman v. Boltinghouse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• any error in counsel’s statements during opening argument summarizing the testimony of a witness who did not ultimately testify was harmless because the evidence was properly introduced by other witness testimony
• “The trial court has wide discretion in determining relevancy and materiality, and furthermore, where the relevancy or competency is doubtful, it should be admitted, and its weight left to the determination of the jury” (punctuation omitted)
• “The trial court has wide discretion in determining relevancy and materiality, and furthermore, where the relevancy or competency is doubtful, it should be admitted, and its weight left to the determination of the jury” (punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).