Waterman Steamship Corp. S. E. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Considering “the fact that [the testimony at issue] reflected simply lay approximation of times spent working, the Court cannot find they reflect significant inconsistencies.”
• agreeing with plaintiffs argument that “in the instant case, class members are readily identifiable by payroll records”
• certifying the class, stating that “[wjhile it is true that some defense declarants stated that they did not perform pre-shift work, nearly all of Plaintiffs’ declarations, and a significant number of Defendant’s declarations, assert that they did”
• “Plaintiffs’ failure to describe a method for determining damages without being provided the opportunity to conduct discovery on the issue shall not prevent the Court from establishing predominance.”
• explaining the legal standard 10 that governs the decertification analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).