Waterhouse v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Waterhouse “cannot generate a genuine issue of material fact by making statements in an affidavit that directly contradict his sworn deposition testimony given in the case”
• requiring competent historians’ testimony to establish ‘‘common knowledge’’ of dangers of cigarette smoking from 1940s through 1960s

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).