Skip to main content
· 3/22/1983

Waterbury Construction Co. v. Board of Education

Citations

  • 189 Conn. 560
  • 457 A.2d 310
  • 1983 Conn. LEXIS 471

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that award did not conform to submission when amount in award related to issue not specifically included in detailed list of issues submitted to arbitrator
  • where, upon a motion to correct and/or modify, the court can eliminate independent claims that were not submitted to the arbitrator
  • application to correct should be granted only where by doing so merits of portion of award within submission are not affected
  • award determined, in part, on basis of item parties had not submitted to arbitration
  • award determined, in part, on basis of item parties had not submitted to arbitration
  • when award was ambiguous as to whether damages awarded on claims included issue outside scope of submission, arbitrators’ memorandum examined to determine whether award included damages that were not related to issue within scope of arbitration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peters, Parskey, Shea, Grillo, Daly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.