Water Wheel Camp Recreational Area, Inc. v. Larance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that Indian land can exist outside of a reservation and citing to a statute involving Indian country
• noting that the Supreme Court has “articulated the general rule that a tribe’s adjudicative jurisdiction may not exceed its regulatory jurisdiction”
• emphasizing that “the activity interfered directly with the [T]ribe’s inherent powers to exclude and manage its own lands, and there are no competing state interests at play”
• emphasizing that “the activity interfered directly with the [T]ribe’s inherent powers to exclude and manage its own lands, and there are no competing state interests at play”
• stating that the tribe’s right to exclude nonmembers from tribal land includes the power to regulate them “unless Congress has said otherwise, or unless the Supreme Court has recognized that such power conflicts with federal interests promoting tribal self government”
• collecting cases confirming that Montana does not apply to a Tribe’s jurisdiction over non-Indians on Indian land

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).