Skip to main content
· 4/7/2008

WASTE MGMT. NJ, INC. v. Union County Utils. Auth.

Citations

  • 945 A.2d 73
  • 399 N.J. Super. 508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a less rigid standard for imposition of interlocutory injunctive relief when designed solely to preserve the status quo
  • noting Rule 4:52 \does not allow for the entry of an order to show cause for the entry of a permanent injunction\
  • reversing a final judgment entered on the return date of an order to show cause, finding no \clear and unambiguous statement from the judge [or] unequivocal consent of the parties to a final resolution.\
  • \The time-honored approach in ascertaining whether a party has demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of success requires a determination of whether the material facts are in dispute and whether the applicable law is settled.\
  • detailing the requirements for an interlocutory injunction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Stern, A.A. Rodrãguez and C.S. Fisher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.