· 4/7/2008
WASTE MGMT. NJ, INC. v. Union County Utils. Auth.
Citations
- 945 A.2d 73
- 399 N.J. Super. 508
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing a less rigid standard for imposition of interlocutory injunctive relief when designed solely to preserve the status quo
- noting Rule 4:52 \does not allow for the entry of an order to show cause for the entry of a permanent injunction\
- reversing a final judgment entered on the return date of an order to show cause, finding no \clear and unambiguous statement from the judge [or] unequivocal consent of the parties to a final resolution.\
- \The time-honored approach in ascertaining whether a party has demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of success requires a determination of whether the material facts are in dispute and whether the applicable law is settled.\
- detailing the requirements for an interlocutory injunction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Stern, A.A. Rodrãguez and C.S. Fisher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.