Wasson v. Peabody Coal Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the entry of judgment as a matter of law where the damages award was unsupported in the evidence and based on nothing but speculation and guesses
• affirming the exclusion of expert testimony regarding the average price of a product where the testimony was based on sales of the product to only a single customer
• Plaintiff had ample time to determine whether additional discovery was necessary, ‘but he chose to sit on the matter.”
• one sale was insufficient basis to calculate average of sales over twenty years
• affirming exclusion of testimony on these facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).