Skip to main content
· 10/25/2002

Wassilie v. State

Citations

  • 57 P.3d 719
  • 2002 Alas. App. LEXIS 219
  • 2002 WL 31399697

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that prior inconsistent statements were admissible under Evidence Rule 801(d)(1)(A) where an elderly witness could not recall at trial prior statements he made to police investigating an assault

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coats, Mannheimer, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.