Wasserman v. Bartholomew

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that excluding evidence under Evidence Rule 403 on the grounds of “waste of time” and “undue delay,” when the evidence pertains to the central issue at trial, “is rarely within the trial court’s discretion”
• describing cumulative evidence as that which either “support[s] an uncontested or established fact” or “repeat[s] a point made by previous evidence”
• “Prior representation by a judge of the state or a municipality is not enumerated among grounds for disqualification in the statute or the canon.”
• “[W]e have relied upon the canon to interpret the [judicial disqualification] statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).