Waskey v. Lewis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the lower court’s decision to enjoin the Defendant from erecting a gate to obstruct an easement and remanding to the lower court to determine damages incurred
• refusing to disturb a factual finding of the trial court when appellant failed to introduce a relevant document into the evidence that appellant had referred to and had presented at the trial
• affirming determination of road’s dimensions where trial court based its decision on “testimony of . . . several witnesses respecting the road’s width, and having observed the plat referred to in the deed”
• “without let or hinderance” defined to preclude the erection of manually-operated gates across an easement right of way

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).