Washington v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the proper standard of review for prejudice on claims of sentencing error is “that but for counsel's deficient performance, there is a reasonable probability that he would have received a lesser sentence”
• regarding requirement of a reasonable probability of a lesser sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• DOUGLAS LEE STROSNIDER, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2016-12-13· cited 4×
• Carlton L. Porter, Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2019-03-26· cited 3×
• Joseph B. Sprofera v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2020-10-27
• Williams v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2018-10-09
• Brian McBenge v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2022-12-20
• JOHN MICHAEL HOUSE, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2024-07-10

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Brooks
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1997-12-23· cited 131×
• Forrest v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2009-06-16· cited 81×
• Hutchison v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2004-12-07· cited 76×
• Vaca v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2010-06-15· cited 72×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2011-03-01· cited 57×
• Antwine v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1990-06-19· cited 41×
• Hubbard v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-08-01· cited 22×
• Henderson v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-10-19· cited 19×
• Rush v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2012-05-29· cited 16×
• State v. Sparkling
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-11-29· cited 12×
• State v. Washington
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-11-08· cited 1×