Skip to main content

Washington v. State

Citations

  • 758 N.E.2d 1014
  • 2001 WL 1519713

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that due process requires such a written statement of the trial court’s reasons for revoking probation
  • noting that the transcript of the revocation hearing had been placed in the record and clearly disclosed the court’s basis for revoking the defendant’s probation
  • noting that the transcript of the revocation hearing had been placed in the record and clearly disclosed the court’s basis for revoking the defendant’s probation
  • finding no deprivation of a neutral and detached fact finder when the court made comments during revocation of probation proceedings about defendant’s substance abuse
  • finding no due process violation even where the trial court failed to enter a written sentencing statement at all but where the transcript of his revocation hearing in the record revealed the basis for the revocation
  • due process requires that the petition for revocation disclose the grounds upon which revocation is being sought

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.