Washington v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The 6 term ‘present’ means the record must show that the movant for a new trial sustained the burden of actually delivering the motion for new trial to the attention or actual notice of the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Means v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-08-04· cited 51×
• Billy Clay Wade v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2014-03-27
• Jason Joseph McDowell v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2014-02-27
• Juan Antonio Maldonado v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2014-02-20
• Prudencio Mandez Ortiz v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2013-01-31
• Cody Leroy Moore v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-08-25
• Reuben E. Means v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-08-04

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Carranza v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-01-21· cited 326×
• Thompson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2007-12-13· cited 62×
• Anthony D. Washington v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2008-08-29· cited 1×