Washington v. Roberts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an inmate has a due-process right to an impartial hearing when liberty or property interests are at stake
• acknowledging Wolff weighs against a constitutional due process right to confront and cross-examine witnesses
• finding no due process violation based on the charging officer's physical absence from the disciplinary hearing where charging officer was placed under oath, testified by telephone, and petitioner was able to question her concerning the incident
• \[T]he extraction of a fine implicates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution even when only a small amount has been taken from an inmate's account.\
• \[T]he extraction of a fine implicates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution even when only a small amount has been taken from an inmate's account.\
• \[T]he extraction of a fine implicates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution even when only a small amount has been taken from an inmate's account.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).