Washington v. Outrage, Inc.
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 2263
Syllabus
Summary judgment negligence invitee actual notice constructive notice defect abuse of discretion Civ.R. 56 discovery de novo. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in enforcing its own discovery deadline and declining to consider evidence submitted by plaintiff in violation of Civ.R. 56. Summary judgment in favor of defendant was proper where there was no genuine issue of material fact as to plaintiff's negligence claim because defendant did not have actual or constructive notice of a defect prior to plaintiff's injury.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an affidavit attesting to the justness of a plaintiffs cause of action is unnecessary where a judgment is confessed in an action in which process has been regularly issued and served
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kilbane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.