Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 5/24/1909

Washington v. Oregon

Citations

  • 214 U.S. 205
  • 29 S. Ct. 631
  • 53 L. Ed. 969
  • 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1909

Syllabus

<p>Washington v. Oregon, 211 U. S. 127, reaffirmed’on rehearing.</p> <p>Although the volume of water and depth of a channel have constantly diminished, if it all results from process of accretion, or, as in this case, possibly from jetties constructed by governmental authority, that channel still remains the boundary line, the precise line of separation being the varying center thereof.</p> <p>The settlement of boundaries is generally attended with difficulties’ and it is wise for adjacent States to adjust their boundaries by boundary commissions and agreements as has been done with the consent of Congress in several instances.</p>

Judges: Brewer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.