Washington v. Oregon
Citations
- 214 U.S. 205
- 29 S. Ct. 631
- 53 L. Ed. 969
- 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1909
Syllabus
<p>Washington v. Oregon, 211 U. S. 127, reaffirmed’on rehearing.</p> <p>Although the volume of water and depth of a channel have constantly diminished, if it all results from process of accretion, or, as in this case, possibly from jetties constructed by governmental authority, that channel still remains the boundary line, the precise line of separation being the varying center thereof.</p> <p>The settlement of boundaries is generally attended with difficulties’ and it is wise for adjacent States to adjust their boundaries by boundary commissions and agreements as has been done with the consent of Congress in several instances.</p>
Judges: Brewer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hinderlider v. La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co.Supreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 175×
- Texas v. New MexicoSupreme Court· 1983-06-17· cited 87×
- Colorado v. KansasSupreme Court· 1943-12-06· cited 51×
- Virginia v. West VirginiaSupreme Court· 1918-04-22· cited 44×
- Minnesota v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1920-03-08· cited 30×
- Arkansas v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1919-05-19· cited 21×
- McGowan v. Columbia River Packers' Assn.Supreme Court· 1917-12-17· cited 17×
- North Dakota v. MinnesotaSupreme Court· 1924-01-28· cited 16×
- State v. CunninghamMississippi Supreme Court· 1912-03-15· cited 11×
- Columbia River Packers' Ass'n v. McGowanNinth Circuit· 1914-11-16· cited 9×
- Veatch v. WhiteNinth Circuit· 1927-11-28· cited 7×
- La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co. v. HinderliderSupreme Court of Colorado· 1933-07-03· cited 4×
- The Port of Portland, a Municipal Corporation v. An Island in the Columbia RiverNinth Circuit· 1973-06-19· cited 2×
- State v. PepperCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-12-26· cited 2×
- United States v. Columbia River Packers Ass'nD. Oregon· 1935-07-06· cited 1×
- Graphic Packaging Corporation v. Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas And Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2015-04-17
- Davis v. Columbia River Packers' Ass'nW.D. Washington· 1931-06-05
- Columbia River Packers' Ass'n v. McGowanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Washington· 1909-09-10
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.