Skip to main content
· 12/15/2006

Washington v. Hill

Citations

  • 960 So. 2d 643
  • 2006 WL 3692546

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellate court will not consider arguments unsupported by citations to legal authority
  • statutory provisions governing election contest must be strictly observed and construed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.