Washington v. Gonyea

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that RLUIPA does not create a private right of action against state officials in their individual capacities
• noting that “RLUIPA does not provide a cause of action against state officials in their individual capacities”
• declining to consider “whether RLUIPA authorizes individual-capacity suits under the imprimatur of the commerce clause” where plaintiff “pled no facts” pertaining to interstate commerce
• declining to consider “whether RLUIPA authorizes individual-capacity suits under the imprimatur of the commerce clause” where plaintiff “pled no facts” pertaining to interstate commerce
• “RLUIPA does not provide a cause of action against state officials in their individual capacities . . . .”
• “RLUIPA does not provide a cause of action against state officials in their individual capacities . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).