Skip to main content
· 12/2/1980

Washington v. Clayter

Citations

  • 414 N.E.2d 1085
  • 91 Ill. App. 3d 489
  • 46 Ill. Dec. 932
  • 1980 Ill. App. LEXIS 4056

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that because the defendant did not present the appellate court with a transcript of the hearing on the motion, he waived all points that could be reviewed only by a consideration of what actually transpired at the hearing
  • finding that because the defendant did not present the appellate court with a transcript of the hearing on the motion, he waived all points that could be reviewed only by a consideration of what actually transpired at the hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stamos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.