Skip to main content
· 2/4/1930

Washington Post Co. v. Kelly

Citations

  • 38 F.2d 151
  • 59 App. D.C. 214
  • 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2270

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The requirement that parties to an appeal set out the proper standard of review for each assignment of error is not a mere formality.”
  • even though a case is an equity case, de novo review applies only in “some procedural postures”
  • “Normal devel- opmental changes * * * are not unanticipated changes * * * and so cannot, in themselves, provide the basis for a change in circumstances.”
  • “[T]here can be no directed verdict in a case tided to the court.”
  • even an accomplished move does not amount to a substantial change in circumstances unless it “has had a significant adverse effect” on a parent’s “capacity to care for the children”
  • “[W]ritten orders control over oral judicial statements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.