· 2/4/1930
Washington Post Co. v. Kelly
Citations
- 38 F.2d 151
- 59 App. D.C. 214
- 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2270
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The requirement that parties to an appeal set out the proper standard of review for each assignment of error is not a mere formality.”
- even though a case is an equity case, de novo review applies only in “some procedural postures”
- “Normal devel- opmental changes * * * are not unanticipated changes * * * and so cannot, in themselves, provide the basis for a change in circumstances.”
- “[T]here can be no directed verdict in a case tided to the court.”
- even an accomplished move does not amount to a substantial change in circumstances unless it “has had a significant adverse effect” on a parent’s “capacity to care for the children”
- “[W]ritten orders control over oral judicial statements.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.