Skip to main content
· 5/15/1980

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority to the Use and Benefit of Head Construction Company v. Mergentime Corporation, (Two Cases)

Citations

  • 626 F.2d 959
  • 200 U.S. App. D.C. 95

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that district court contract interpretation based solely on language used is subject to de novo review
  • “the plain and unambiguous meaning of an instrument is controlling”
  • “the plain and unambiguous meaning of an instrument is controlling”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGowan, MacKinnon, Pratt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.