Washington Mailers Union No. 29 v. Washington Post Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the presumption to the parties’ dispute over the interpretation of “regular, full-time positions” in the labor contract and concluding that the arbitration clause plausibly included the dispute at issue, and ordering the parties to arbitration
• “While the fact that the arbitration clause in this case is not broad—limiting grievances to allegations of ‘violation of a specific provision of this Agreement’—is relevant to our inquiry, it does not negate the presumption of arbitrability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).