Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. Harmon's Administrator
Citations
- 147 U.S. 571
- 13 S. Ct. 557
- 37 L. Ed. 284
- 1893 U.S. LEXIS 2186
Syllabus
<p>In an action against a common carrier to recover damages for personal injuries, if the facts relating to contributory negligence are disputed, that question should be submitted to the jury; and, if the jury find for the plaintiff, the court is not required, in the exercise of judicial discretion, to set the verdict aside.</p> <p>A railway company being bound to deliver a passenger, its failure to stop long enough to enable him to alight with safety is a neglect of duty which involves liability for injuries resulting therefrom.</p> <p>When the evidence justifies a finding that future damages will result from an accident to a passenger caused by the negligence of a common carrier, the jury may estimate and include such damages in their verdiqt.</p> <p>In the District of Columbia a judgment in an action of tort does not bear Interest.</p> <p>In this case the only error being in an allowance of interest, the court orders the judgment to be affirmed if the interest be remitted; otherwise to be reversed for that error. '</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- examining the soundness of the district court’s exercise of its discretion' pursuant to an ‘unless otherwise ordered by the court’ provision
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beeweb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.