Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. Harmon's Administrator
Citations
- 147 U.S. 571
- 13 S. Ct. 557
- 37 L. Ed. 284
- 1893 U.S. LEXIS 2186
Syllabus
<p>In an action against a common carrier to recover damages for personal injuries, if the facts relating to contributory negligence are disputed, that question should be submitted to the jury; and, if the jury find for the plaintiff, the court is not required, in the exercise of judicial discretion, to set the verdict aside.</p> <p>A railway company being bound to deliver a passenger, its failure to stop long enough to enable him to alight with safety is a neglect of duty which involves liability for injuries resulting therefrom.</p> <p>When the evidence justifies a finding that future damages will result from an accident to a passenger caused by the negligence of a common carrier, the jury may estimate and include such damages in their verdiqt.</p> <p>In the District of Columbia a judgment in an action of tort does not bear Interest.</p> <p>In this case the only error being in an allowance of interest, the court orders the judgment to be affirmed if the interest be remitted; otherwise to be reversed for that error. '</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- examining the soundness of the district court’s exercise of its discretion' pursuant to an ‘unless otherwise ordered by the court’ provision
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beeweb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
76 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court· 1935-01-07· cited 819×
- Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1915-06-21· cited 359×
- Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. AllenSupreme Court· 1928-02-20· cited 170×
- Pierce v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1921-03-21· cited 157×
- McDermott v. SevereSupreme Court· 1906-05-25· cited 114×
- Miller v. Union Pacific R. Co.Supreme Court· 1933-12-04· cited 111×
- Schneider v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.D.C. Circuit· 1981-06-17· cited 91×
- Denver & R. G. R. v. RodderNinth Circuit· 1900-02-05· cited 77×
- Hansen v. BoydSupreme Court· 1896-03-02· cited 73×
- Buechner v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1904-04-11· cited 70×
- Chunn v. City & Suburban R. Co. of WashingtonSupreme Court· 1907-12-02· cited 68×
- Fisch v. MangerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1957-04-01· cited 52×
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. CarnahanSupreme Court· 1916-05-22· cited 49×
- Cameron v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1898-11-11· cited 49×
- Tobin v. Pennsylvania R. Co.D.C. Circuit· 1938-10-24· cited 43×
- Watkins v. Birmingham Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1897-11-15· cited 34×
- In re SternSecond Circuit· 1902-06-03· cited 27×
- Packard v. Lacing Stud Co.First Circuit· 1895-10-18· cited 24×
- Becker Bros. v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1925-06-01· cited 23×
- Smyth Sales, Inc. v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.Third Circuit· 1944-02-24· cited 23×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court· 1876-12-18· cited 367×
- Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co. v. TolsonSupreme Court· 1891-04-06· cited 312×
- Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. ConverseSupreme Court· 1891-03-30· cited 223×
- Kennon v. GilmerSupreme Court· 1889-05-13· cited 203×
- Keller v. AshfordSupreme Court· 1890-03-03· cited 186×
- Mitchell v. HarmonySupreme Court· 1852-05-12· cited 173×
- Phillips & Colby Construction Co. v. SeymourSupreme Court· 1876-01-11· cited 137×
- In Re Washington & Georgetown RailroadSupreme Court· 1891-04-27· cited 90×
- Massachusetts Benefit Assn. v. MilesSupreme Court· 1891-01-19· cited 45×
- Perkins v. FourniquetSupreme Court· 1853-01-18· cited 36×
- The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, in Error v. John Ashley and John EllaSupreme Court· 1829-02-14· cited 31×
- Baltimore City Passenger Railway Co. v. SewellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1873-02-20· cited 27×
- Karthaus v. OwingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1830-06-15· cited 15×
- District of Columbia v. GannonSupreme Court· 1889-04-01· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.