Skip to main content
· 3/6/1893

Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. Harmon's Administrator

Citations

  • 147 U.S. 571
  • 13 S. Ct. 557
  • 37 L. Ed. 284
  • 1893 U.S. LEXIS 2186

Syllabus

<p>In an action against a common carrier to recover damages for personal injuries, if the facts relating to contributory negligence are disputed, that question should be submitted to the jury; and, if the jury find for the plaintiff, the court is not required, in the exercise of judicial discretion, to set the verdict aside.</p> <p>A railway company being bound to deliver a passenger, its failure to stop long enough to enable him to alight with safety is a neglect of duty which involves liability for injuries resulting therefrom.</p> <p>When the evidence justifies a finding that future damages will result from an accident to a passenger caused by the negligence of a common carrier, the jury may estimate and include such damages in their verdiqt.</p> <p>In the District of Columbia a judgment in an action of tort does not bear Interest.</p> <p>In this case the only error being in an allowance of interest, the court orders the judgment to be affirmed if the interest be remitted; otherwise to be reversed for that error. '</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • examining the soundness of the district court’s exercise of its discretion' pursuant to an ‘unless otherwise ordered by the court’ provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beeweb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.