Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Transamerica Premier Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that overlooking a notice of service because of a mistaken belief that there was thirty days to respond instead of twenty was not inadvertence or excusable neglect
• noting that when exercising its discretion under Rule 60(b
• noting that when exercising its discretion under Rule 60(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).