Skip to main content
· 6/18/1997

Washington Capital Corp. v. MILANDCO

Citations

  • 695 So. 2d 838
  • 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6693
  • 1997 WL 329573

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming dismissal of complaint where plaintiff had already amended and “did not controvert any of the allegations in defendants’ affidavit”
  • “It is not enough that a foreign defendant merely contract with a Florida resident.”
  • initial inquiry is whether Florida’s long-arm jurisdiction has been sufficiently established; second inquiry is whether constitutional minimum contacts has been satisfied, citing Doe v. 620 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1993), and Venetian Salami
  • failure of plaintiff to refute allegations of defendant’s affidavit requires granting of dismissal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pariente

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.