Washington Cadillac Co. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• highlighting that Washington’s crime victims’ rights do not abrogate a defendant’s due process right and are not to be considered in a vacuum but must be considered together with a defendant’s due process right
• investigating officers function as arm of prosecution and thus are agents of prosecution bound by prosecutor’s promises under plea agreement
• investigating officer’s unsolicited testimony attacked each point favoring the plea agreement
• “we adhere” to the holding in Sanchez that an investigating officer “may not undermine a plea agreement”
• \Harmless error review does not apply when the State breaches a plea agreement.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).