Skip to main content
· 3/22/1901

Washington Bank v. Horn

Citations

  • 24 Wash. 299
  • 64 P. 534
  • 1901 Wash. LEXIS 532

Syllabus

<p>DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR FAILURE TO FILE COMPLAINT-RULES OF COURT-PRESUMPTIONS.</p> <p>The presumption that the trial court acted regularly and upon sufficient cause, in dismissing pn action without prejudice, because of plaintiff’s failure to file bis complaint, is not overcome by the fact that twenty-four hours’ notice was not given plaintiff, as required by a rule of the court, since the court has the right, for good reasons, to suspend its own rules.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • marital status of parties controlled by law of their domicile
  • marital status of parties controlled by law of their domicile

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dunbar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.