Washington Bancorporation v. Hodges (In Re Washington Bancorporation)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding gross insolvency of $32 million on the petition date may permit an inference of insolvency on a date preceding the petition date, but that same inference cannot be applied to a date six months prior to the petition date
• “The courts will only consider retro-jection if the evidence of insolvency on the certain date is accompanied by evidence that the debtor[’]s financial condition did not change during the pendency period between the time of the payment and the date of proven insolvency.”
• six-month gap was too long
• six-month gap was too long
• six-month gap was too long

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).