Washington-Baltimore Newspaper Guild, Local 35 v. The Washington Post Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting potential for remand to “undercut the finality and therefore the entire usefulness of arbitration as an expeditious and generally fair method of settling disputes”
• neither Rule 60(b) nor any of the other Federal Rules of Civil Procedure was designed to apply to arbitration awards
• neither Rule 60(b) nor any of the other Federal Rules of Civil Procedure was designed to apply to arbitration awards
• arbitration should be a final and binding means of dispute resolution, and courts should follow a policy of minimal interference with arbitration
• “Of course, neither Rule 60(b) per se nor, for that matter, any other of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure was ever designed to apply to proceedings in other than the United States District Courts.”
• “Of course, neither Rule 60(b) 19 per se nor, for that matter, any other of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure was ever 20 designed to apply to proceedings in other than the United States District Courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).