Washington Ass'n of Churches v. Reed

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Congress intended the Section 303(a) [of HAVA] list to be “an administrative safeguard for ‘storing and managing the official list of registered voters,’ and not as a restriction on voter eligibility”
• finding that Congress intended the Section 303(a) of HAVA list to be “an administrative safeguard for ‘storing and managing the official list of registered voters,’ and not as a restriction on voter eligibility”
• “[Requiring a match prior to registration directly conflicts with 42 U.S.C. 15473(b).”
• \[R]equiring a match prior to registration directly conflicts with 42 U.S.C. 15473(b).\
• enjoining enforcement of “matching” statute, requiring state to match potential voter's name to Social Security Administration or Department of Licensing database, because failure to match applicant's information was not material to determining qualification to vote
• enjoining enforcement of “matching” statute, requiring state to match potential voter's name to Social Security Administration or Department of Licensing database, because failure to match applicant's information was not material to determining qualification to vote

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).