Washington Arbitration Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Court was “quite frankly reading into [Act 111] the requirement that the scope of [a] submission to the arbitrators be limited to conflicts over legitimate terms and conditions of employment” (emphasis added)
• invalidating portion of award regarding payment of hospitalization insurance premiums as contravening third class city code
• invalidating portion of award regarding payment of hospitalization insurance premiums as contravening third class city code
• vacating the portion of an interest arbitration award requiring the employer to perform an illegal act, while leaving the rest of the award intact
• construing former Supreme Court Rule 68]6 and reviewing interest arbitration award
• construing former Supreme Court Rule 68½ and reviewing interest arbitration award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).