Washburn v. Frank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion for judgment on the pleadings to dismiss willful infringement when the accused infringer continued to sell the accused product after receiving notice of the patent and being sent claim charts twice before the suit was commenced
• “Allowing allegations of willful infringement to advance past the current stage appears prudent, given that, in the opening round of litigation, the full extent of the circumstances accompanying a given case will seldom be readily apparent to the Court.”
• “Halo’s effect on the “[P]leading knowledge requires only allegations that the party inducing or contributing to infringement know of (or be willfully blind to the existence of

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).