Washburn v. Esser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that use of a common beach access road running across the property of four adjoining landowners constituted adverse use, and affirming conclusion that a prescriptive easement had been created

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Orton v. Carter
  Utah Supreme Court· 1998-11-10· cited 57×
• Lee v. Lozier
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-09-29· cited 46×
• GRANITE BEACH HOLDINGS v. State
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-10-30· cited 44×
• Crites v. Koch
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-08-06· cited 39×
• Granite Beach Holdings, L.L.C. v. Department of Natural Resources
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-10-30· cited 39×
• Kunkel v. Fisher
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-06-04· cited 38×
• Crescent Harbor Water Co. v. Lyseng
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1988-05-09· cited 28×
• Lingvall v. Bartmess
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-08-27· cited 28×
• Walker v. Hollinger
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1998-11-27· cited 14×
• Smith v. Breen
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-07-15· cited 9×
• Fies v. Storey
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-10-03· cited 9×
• Adams v. Skagit County
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1977-07-18· cited 5×
• Brock Maslonka, et ux v. Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2022-03-03
• Brock Maslonka v. Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille Cty.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2022-08-02

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cuillier v. Coffin
  Washington Supreme Court· 1961-01-26· cited 35×
• Miller v. Jarman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1970-07-06· cited 16×
• Lechman v. Mills
  Washington Supreme Court· 1907-07-26· cited 14×