Eleventh Circuit· 11/15/2019
Waseem Daker v. Theodore Jackson
Citations
- 942 F.3d 1252
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Daker v. NBC, No. 15-330 (2d Cir. May 22, 2015), counted as a strike
- noting that “prisoner indigents who frequently file lawsuits do not form a suspect or quasi-suspect class”
- holding the right to proceed in forma pauperis in a civil case “is a privilege, not a right – fundamental or otherwise” and that “§ 1915(g) does not burden a fundamental right”
- holding 1 In relevant part, the statute reads: 2 Case: 17-15115 Date Filed: 04/03/2020 Page: 3 of 7 that Daker had at least seven strikes and was therefore ineligible for in forma pauperis status
- listing six appeals Daker filed between May 26, 2016 and December 19, 2016 that were dismissed as frivolous and constituted “strikes” under the PLRA
- explaining denial of appeal as frivolous constitutes strike
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court· 2007-01-22· cited 10,443×
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 7,493×
- Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. FalwellSupreme Court· 1988-02-24· cited 951×
- Snyder v. PhelpsSupreme Court· 2011-03-02· cited 867×
- Miller v. DonaldEleventh Circuit· 2008-08-29· cited 602×
- Rivera v. AllinEleventh Circuit· 1998-06-23· cited 361×
- BE&K Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 298×
- Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 2016-05-04· cited 155×
- Ranch House, Inc. v. AmersonEleventh Circuit· 2001-01-17· cited 33×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.