Skip to main content
· 3/30/2004

Wärtsilä NSD North America, Inc. v. Hill International, Inc.

Citations

  • 315 F. Supp. 2d 623
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7370
  • 2004 WL 943621

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A [Rule 11] motion should not be employed as a discovery device or to test the legal sufficiency or efficacy of allegations in the pleadings; other motions are available for those purposes.”
  • “A [Rule 11] motion should not be employed as a discovery device or to test the legal sufficiency or efficacy of allegations in the pleadings; other motions are available for those purposes.”
  • Rule 11 sanctions awarded under exceptional circumstances
  • Rule 11 sanctions awarded under exceptional circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brotman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.