· 7/26/1950
Warsofsky v. Sherman
Citations
- 93 N.E.2d 612
- 326 Mass. 290
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deciding on summary judgment record that fiduciary relationship existed based on nature of parties’ interactions, despite denial by fiduciary of existence of fiduciary relationship
- stating that there are varied circumstances that can give rise to a fiduciary relationship and that whether such a relationship existed is a question of fact
- finding information regarding proposed re-purchase of assets given to bank officer was confidential information and imposing equitable relief where bank officer misused such information
- fiduciary relationship existed where the defendant was a bank official and the plaintiff met him during working hours seeking financial assistance from the bank
- the circumstances which may create a fiduciary relationship are so varied that it would be unwise to attempt formulation of any comprehensive definition
- “The existence of [a fiduciary] relationship in any particular case is to be determined by the facts established”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Qua, Ronan, Wilkins, Spalding, Counihan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.