Skip to main content
· 7/26/1950

Warsofsky v. Sherman

Citations

  • 93 N.E.2d 612
  • 326 Mass. 290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding on summary judgment record that fiduciary relationship existed based on nature of parties’ interactions, despite denial by fiduciary of existence of fiduciary relationship
  • stating that there are varied circumstances that can give rise to a fiduciary relationship and that whether such a relationship existed is a question of fact
  • finding information regarding proposed re-purchase of assets given to bank officer was confidential information and imposing equitable relief where bank officer misused such information
  • fiduciary relationship existed where the defendant was a bank official and the plaintiff met him during working hours seeking financial assistance from the bank
  • the circumstances which may create a fiduciary relationship are so varied that it would be unwise to attempt formulation of any comprehensive definition
  • “The existence of [a fiduciary] relationship in any particular case is to be determined by the facts established”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Qua, Ronan, Wilkins, Spalding, Counihan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.