Warren Y.S.C. Albano Caroline C.S. Albano,plaintiffs-Appellants v. Norwest Financial Hawaii, Inc.,defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that “the doctrine applies if the issues ‘could have been raised in the earlier state court actions.’”
• holding default judgment in foreclosure action was 10 final judgment barring borrowers’ later filed Truth in Lending Act claim
• reiterating that “the doctrine applies if the issues ‘could have been raised in the earlier state court actions.’”
• reaching a similar conclusion when a TILA claim was barred under state preclusion law
• “There can be no doubt whatsoever that the plaintiff’s TILA claim could have been litigated in the foreclosure action. It was a defense that would have ineluctably precluded foreclosure if the plaintiff’s claims are meritorious.”
• “There can be no doubt whatsoever that the plaintiff’s . . . claim could have been litigated in the foreclosure action. It was a defense that would have ineluctably precluded foreclosure if the plaintiff’s claims are meritorious.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).