Warren v. Woods

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that ALJ erred by rejecting opinion on the grounds that it made dispositive findings on claimant’s ability to work where the opinion at issue included specific functional limitations
• finding that ALJ erred by rejecting opinion on the grounds that it made dispositive findings on claimant’s ability to work where the opinion at issue included specific functional limitations
• “Weighing the opinions and findings of treating, examining, and non-examining physicians is an integral part of steps four and five of the ALJ’s sequential evaluation process for determining disability.”
• “Weighing the opinions and findings of treating, examining, and non-examining physicians is an integral part of steps four and five of the ALJ’s sequential evaluation process for determining disability.”
• “Weighing the opinions and findings of treating, examining, and non-examining physicians is an integral part of steps four and five of the ALJ’s sequential evaluation process for determining disability.”
• “Weighing the opinions and findings of treating, examining, and non-examining physicians is an integral part of steps four and five of the ALJ’s sequential evaluation process for determining disability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).